[Updated: 2016-10-29T14:45:42.973+09:00]
References:
Cheng, Chung–Ying. 2002. “On The Metaphysical Significance Of Ti (Body–Embodiment) In Chinese Philosophy: Benti (Origin–Substance) and Ti–Yong (Substance And Function).” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29 (2): 145–161.
Cua, Antonio S. 2002. “On The Ethical Significance Of The Ti–Yong Distinction.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29 (2): 163–170.
Gedalecia, David. 1974. “Excursion in Substance and Function: The Development of the T’i-Yung Paradigm in Chu Hsi.” Philosophy East and West 24 (4): 443–451.
Hirai Shun'ei 平井俊栄. 1979. “Chugoku bukkyō to taiyū shisō 中国仏教と体用思想.” Risō理想 549 60–72.
----. 1990. “Sanron kyōgaku no rekishiteki tenkai 三論教学の歴史的展開.” ----, ed. 1990. Sanron kyōgaku no kenkyū 三論教学の研究. Tokyo: Shunjūsha. 3–27(L).
Hirakawa Akira 平川彰. 1987. “Kishin ron ni okeru sandai no imi 起信論における三大の意味.” Hokkaido Journal of Indological and Buddhist Studies 2 1–19.
Honda Ryunin 本多隆仁. 2002. “A Comparative Study of taisōyū (体相用) and zi-taisōyū (自体相用) in Shakumakaenron 釈摩訶衍論.” Journal of Chizan Studies 51 17–30.
Kong, Roberta Lion. 1979. “Metaphysics and East-West Philosophy: Applying the Chinese T’i-yung Paradigm.” Philosophy East and West 29 (1): 49–58.
Lai, Whalen. 1975. The Awakening of Faith in Mahayana (Ta-ch'eng ch'i-hsin lun): A Study of the Unfolding of Sinitic Mahayana Motifs. Cambridge MA.
Lai, Whalen W. 1983. “Ch'an Metaphors: Waves, Water, Mirror, Lamp.” Philosophy East and West 29 243–253.
Lynn, Richard John. 1999. The Classic of the Way and Virtue: A New Translation of the Tao-Te Ching of Laozi as Interpreted by Wang Bi. New York: Columbia University Press.
Muller, A. Charles. 1995. “The Key Operative Concepts in Korean Buddhist Syncretic Philosophy: Interpenetration and Essence-Function in Wŏnhyo, Chinul and Kihwa.” Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University 3 33–48.
----. 1996. “The Composition of Self-Transformation Thought in Classical East Asian Philosophy and Religion.” Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University 4 141–152.
----. 2000. “Tiyong and Interpenetration in the Analects of Confucius: The Sacred as Secular.” Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University 8 93–106.
----. 2015. Korea’s Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt’ong (Kihwa). Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press. Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion.
----. 2016. “Philosophical Aspects of the Goryeo-Joseon Confucian- Buddhist Confrontation: Focusing on the Works of Jeong Dojeon (Sambong) and Hamheo Deuktong (Gihwa).” Min, Anselm. 2016. Korean Religions in Relation. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press. 53–85. SUNY Series in Korean Studies.
----. 2016. “The Emergence of Essence-Function (ti-yong) 體用 Hermeneutics in the Sinification of Indic Buddhism: An Overview.” Critical Review of Buddhist Studies 19 111–152.
Nakamura, Masafumi. 1988. “On the Concept of ti, xiang and yong, with Reference to the Shi-mo he-yan lun.” Journal of Esoteric Buddhism 1988 (163): 49–72.
Ng, Yu-kwan. 2003. “Xiong Shili's Metaphysical Theory about the Non-Separability of Substance and Function.” Makeham, John, ed. 2003. New Confucianism: A Critical Examination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Park, Sung Bae. 1983. Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment. Albany: SUNY Press.
----. 2009. One Korean's Approach to Buddhism: The Mom/Momjit Paradigm. Albany: SUNY Press.
Shimada Kenji 島田虔次. 1967. Shushigaku to Yōmeigaku 朱子学と陽明学. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.
----. 1991. “Taiyū no rekishi ni yosete 體用の歴史に寄せて.” 1991. Tsukamoto Hakase hanju kinen bukkyōshi ronshū 塚本博士頒壽記念佛教史學論集. Tokyo: 416–430.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2003. “Li (Principle, Coherence) in Chinese Buddhism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30 (3‐4): 501–524.
----. 2012. Ironies of Oneness and Difference: Coherence in Early Chinese Thought: Prolegomena to the Study of Li. Albany: State University of New York Press.